{"NewsItems":[{"Headline":"No clear plan to deliver NHS in Scotland vision","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/NHS-Auditor-General.jpg","Content":"

\"NHS-Auditor-General\"<\/p>\n

Written by Midlothian View Reporter, Luke Jackson<\/b><\/p>\n

The Scottish Government needs a delivery plan that clearly explains to the public how it will reform the NHS and address the pressures on services. <\/p>\n

Despite increasing funding and staffing, the NHS in Scotland is still seeing fewer patients than before the Covid-19 pandemic. Auditors found that: <\/p>\n

– commitments to reducing waiting lists and times have not been met <\/p>\n

– the number of people remaining in hospital because their discharge has been delayed is the highest on record
\n– and NHS initiatives to improve productivity and patient outcomes have yet to have an impact and lack clear progress reporting. <\/p>\n

Health accounts for about 40 per cent of the Scottish budget. Funding grew again in 2023\/24 but has mostly been used to cover pay commitments and inflation. Costs are forecast to continue rising and making savings remains challenging. Work to build new healthcare facilities also remains paused. <\/p>\n

The Scottish Government\u2019s restated vision for health and social care is not clear on how these operational pressures on the NHS will be addressed or how reform will be prioritised. It needs to work with NHS staff, partners and the public to set out a clear delivery plan and make tough decisions about how it may change or potentially even stop some services. <\/p>\n

Stephen Boyle, Auditor General for Scotland, said: <\/p>\n

\u201cTo safeguard the NHS, a fundamental change in how services are provided remains urgent. The Scottish Government needs to set out clearly to the public and the health service how it will deliver reform, including how progress will be measured and monitored. <\/p>\n

\u201cDifficult decisions are needed about making services more efficient or, potentially, withdrawing those services with more limited clinical value to allow funding to be re-directed. Taking those steps will require greater leadership from Scottish Government and NHS leaders than we\u2019ve seen to date.\u201d <\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"www.colinbeattiemsp.org\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":25007,"postDateTime":"2024-12-03 06:00:41"},{"Headline":"Residents lose fight to keep bin sheds","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/East-Lothian-bin-shed.jpg","Content":"

\"East-Lothian-bin-shed\"<\/p>\n

Christine Klien is one of the residents who appealed over bin sheds.<\/p>\n

Written by Local Democracy Reporter, Marie Sharp<\/b><\/p>\n

Residents in an East Lothian street have lost their fight to keep their bin sheds after building them on shrubbery beds outside their garden gates.<\/p>\n

Home owners living in Pithead Heights, Prestonpans, created the wooden covers after arguing that the council\u2019s decision to only empty household waste every three weeks left them with stinking bins in their small gardens.<\/p>\n

And they pointed out there was nothing to stop them putting the bins themselves out on the street, adding the wooden covers simply made them look more tidy.<\/p>\n

East Lothian planners ordered the sheds to be removed after a single complaint. Two residents who appealed an enforcement notice to Scottish Ministers have now lost their battle after the Scottish Government Reporter backed council planners saying the land the bins are on must be returned to communal space.<\/p>\n

At least four home owners in Pithead Heights, in Prestonpans, installed the wooden storage units over the last four years.<\/p>\n

However the single complaint from another residents led to years of wrangling with the local authority with the householders ordered to apply for planning permission for the shed, which was then refused.<\/p>\n

Residents Christine Klien and Susan Ralston both appealed the order from the council to remove their bin sheds.<\/p>\n

A third resident Debbie Gray had her appeal dismissed as being submitted a day too late for consideration by the Reporter.<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"bonnyriggrosepitchfund.co.uk\"<\/a>
<\/div>\n

At the time Debbie, a nurse, criticised the council for wasting money pursuing the enforcement notices when there was nothing to stop the residents just putting their bins out on the strip of land.<\/p>\n

She said: \u201cThere is nothing to stop us putting our bins outside our gates all the time. All we have done is put up a storage unit which makes it look tidy and stops recycling from being swept all over the street in windy weather.<\/p>\n

\u201cEast Lothian Council is always banging on that it has no money, so why is it wasting public funds pursuing enforcement action, It is a huge waste of time and money over something which received a single complaint and is doing no harm.\u201d<\/p>\n

Christine Klien, a business operations manager, said she was stunned when the council told her she had unlawfully \u201cextended her garden\u201d.<\/p>\n

She said: \u201cThey have no problem with the bins being left on the same strip of land all the time, other residents have put slabs down over the shrubbery to create a neat spot for them and not faced action.<\/p>\n

\u201cI have a dog and if I keep the household bin in the garden he goes straight to it because the three weekly collections mean it can smell. It ruins the garden for us.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Reporter dismissed both appeals saying the plans for the housing clearly showed no planning permission was in place for the sheds and they did breach planning rules.<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"bonnyriggrosepitchfund.co.uk\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":25011,"postDateTime":"2024-12-02 16:09:27"},{"Headline":"Edinburgh Boiler Company scoops national award","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Edinburgh-Bolier-Company-Award-Win.jpg","Content":"

\"Edinburgh-Bolier-Company-Award-Win\"<\/p>\n

Edinburgh Boiler Company Managing Director Dougie Bell (left) with chairman Mark Glasgow.<\/p>\n

Written by Midlothian View Reporter, Luke Jackson<\/b><\/p>\n

Founder Mark Glasgow has spoken of his pride at the Edinburgh Boiler Company (EBC) being named Building Services Contractor of the Year at the H&V News Awards 2024.<\/p>\n

The Dalkeith business landed the prestigious national honour after impressing the judges with its growth over the past year following a successful transition into renewables.<\/p>\n

The last 12 months has seen the firm more than double its staff to 50, using the nearby Energy Training Academy to upskill gas engineers into heat pumps and electricians into solar battery storage as part of a complete rebrand of the company. Turnover is also on course to hit record levels due to the ongoing demand.<\/p>\n

The H&V News Awards are the biggest and most respected event for the sector and to come out on top in the Contractor of the Year category, is a real milestone for the company which launched in 2015.<\/p>\n

\u201cOne of the key objectives we set at the at the start of the year was winning an H&V News award and it goes without saying how happy we are. Being recognised in this way when up against some of the UK\u2019s largest contractors is a special achievement for us,\u201d said Mark.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe knew we had to adapt to the changes in the sector. Transitioning into renewables was never going to be easy and the team deserves enormous credit for what they have done.<\/p>\n

\u201cI put a lot of faith in Dougie Bell when making him managing director and he has taken the business to another level while fostering a terrific spirit within the staff and delivering an enhanced customer service.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn terms of recognition, it has to be my proudest moment since starting the business. We lifted the Small Company Achievement of the Year award in 2021 but this is the big one we wanted.
\n\u201cCongratulations to all the other winners.\u201d <\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"www.midlothianview.com\/support?referral=MidlothianView\"<\/a>
<\/div>\n

Dougie Bell took on the MD role in January this year as Mark stepped into the chairman role and reflecting on this latest honour, he said: \u201cBeing nominated was a big thing for us but to actually win contractor of the year is incredible.<\/p>\n

\u201cI was stunned when I heard us called out as the winners and there was a bit of disbelief to be honest! It\u2019s still not really sunk in that we have been recognised in the industry as the best contractor in the UK.<\/p>\n

\u201cNone of this would have been possible without our amazing staff, from those in the office to everyone out in the field. It\u2019s been a real team effort and credit to everyone \u2013 this award is for all of them as they have all flourished over the past year.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt was a big decision to move into the renewable space and we carried out a full rebrand of the business to reflect that. If we hadn\u2019t made that transition, we wouldn\u2019t have seen that exceptional growth in the past 12 months.\u201d<\/p>\n

On a memorable night in London for EBC, it was also highly commended in the low carbon impact category.<\/p>\n

Neil Merrett, editor of emap\u2019s H&V News said: \u201cIt is a pleasure to be part of the continued recognition of innovative thinking across the HVAC and building engineering sector. The winners in 2024 demonstrate some of the most transformational technologies, products and services being developed to tackle notable challenges in the supply of lower cost and lower carbon heat for a range of users.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey also serve as important case studies for the wider industry to demonstrate the different approaches to efficiency and decarbonisation.\u201d<\/p>\n

For more information, see theedinburghboilercompany.com<\/a><\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"amzn.to\/3XKWH4m\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":25004,"postDateTime":"2024-12-02 15:30:54"},{"Headline":"Plan to build up to 200 holiday lodges within Dalkeith Country Park","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Dalkieth-Country-Park-Holiday-Lodges.jpg","Content":"

\"Dalkieth-Country-Park-Holiday-Lodges\"<\/p>\n

A lodge at Blenheim Palace gives an example of how Dalkeith holiday accommodation could look.<\/p>\n

Written by Local Democracy Reporter, Marie Sharp<\/b><\/p>\n

A plan to build up to 200 holiday lodges within Dalkeith Country Park will help sustain the estate for the future and boost the local economy, its operators say.<\/p>\n

The proposals are set to have a first look from Midlothian councillors at a meeting of their planning committee next week.<\/p>\n

Buccleuch Estates says the move into holiday accommodation will provide \u2018vital income\u2019 towards its continued stewardship of the country park.<\/p>\n

In their design statement for the lodges they say more investment is needed in the commercial side of the park to attract people all year round and ensure its future. They say: \u201cHoliday lodge accommodation offers an important commercial opportunity for the estate, given the natural beauty and accessibility of its parkland.<\/p>\n

\u201cDeveloped sympathetically within the landscape at an appropriate scale, it would contribute vital income to Buccleuch\u2019s stewardship programme and provide a valuable economic benefit to the local economy, through employment and visitor spend.\u201d<\/p>\n

The proposed site for the lodges lies between Salters Road on the East and the River South Esk on the west over nearly 42 hectares of land.<\/p>\n

In their proposal the applicants say the lodges will be designed to blend in to the natural landscape and will be energy efficient and use eco-friendly material. There are also plans to reduce their footprint by off site construction to deliver them in sections to reduce onsite work and environmental impact.<\/p>\n

They include an image of a lodge retreat cabin at Blenheim Palace as an example of the type proposed.<\/p>\n

The Pre Application Notice will go before planning committee next week for councillors to comment on ahead of any plans being formally submitted.<\/p>\n

They are available to view on the Midlothian Planning Portal HERE<\/a>.<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"www.midlothianview.com\/advertise\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":24999,"postDateTime":"2024-12-02 14:55:14"},{"Headline":"I am supporting My Name'5 Doddie","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/CG-with-Doddie-Weir-2019.jpg","Content":"

\"CG-with-Doddie-Weir-2019\"<\/p>\n

Doddie Weir and Christine Grahame in the Scottish Parliament in 2019.<\/p>\n

Christine Grahame MSP writes her monthly column for Midlothian View<\/strong><\/p>\n

More than 40 years ago, a friend and colleague told me she had been diagnosed with Motor Neurone Disease (MND). Neither she nor I had any real knowledge of what that was or what it meant. These were of course in the days before the internet where you can Google now almost anything. Within a short time she was confined to a chair, and reduced at first to being fed only Complan. Again as swallowing became more and more difficult, that was nor a dietary option, and indeed at one point a perfume dispenser was adapted to squirt water directly into her throat to allow her to keep her to have some fluid. Rough and ready compared thankfully to today\u2019s adaptations. <\/p>\n

But there has not been progress on a cure or even stabilising this dreadful disease. Now you will all have heard of Doddie Weir and seen him in his individual garish tartan suit. Having retired from international rugby, in 2017 he was diagnosed with MND and told he would be confined to a wheelchair within a year. <\/p>\n

Life expectancy is reckoned between one to five years with an erosion of any mobility as the body degenerates, until swallowing, breathing, speaking is taken away too. It is a diagnosis where the patient knows exactly the destination and the route the disease will take. Doddie used the time he had to set up the My Name\u20195 Doddie Foundation in 2017 to raise funds for research into motor neuron disease. <\/p>\n

Since that time, the Foundation has invested over \u00a311 million in research into effective treatments and a cure for MND, but this remains a challenging disease and this will still be a long road to a cure. The Foundation\u2019s single largest annual fundraising campaign is Doddie Aid, which runs from 1 January for five weeks. It sees participants signing up with a \u00a320 one-off donation for their own personal exercise challenge, whether it be running, cycling, swimming, dancing or walking, over the five weeks. <\/p>\n

In my case, that will be limited but we each can set our own achievable targets. I joined in this and the Scottish Parliament recently. Money raised will be invested in research, collaborating, partnering with others to influence the research agenda, and involving people affected by MND in everything the charity does. <\/p>\n

Did you know that approximately 1,100 people are diagnosed with MND every year in the UK and that up to 5,000 adults in the UK are affected at any one time. It is not as rare as you would think. <\/p>\n

Doddie Weir, born in Edinburgh lived most of his life in the Scottish Borders and died there on 26 November 2022. I had the privilege of meeting him while he was still out and about and remember a gentle giant with an endearing smile despite that dreadful disease. 40 years on from my friend and colleague, a cure is no closer but you can do your bit by taking part in the annual fund raising in January. Just visit www.myname5doddie.co.uk<\/a><\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"www.colinbeattiemsp.org\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":24993,"postDateTime":"2024-11-29 14:47:03"},{"Headline":"Lasswade High School Childcare Service closure consultation","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Lasswade-High-School-3g-pitch-drone.jpg","Content":"

\"Lasswade-High-School-3g-pitch-drone\"<\/p>\n

Lasswade High School. Photograph by Lee Live<\/a><\/p>\n

Written by Midlothian View Reporter, Luke Jackson<\/b><\/p>\n

Midlothian Council wants to hear the public\u2019s views on its proposal to close Lasswade High School Childcare Service. <\/p>\n

The statutory consultation begins today and ends on Friday 24 January 2025.<\/p>\n

If given the go ahead, Lasswade High School Childcare Service would close in September 2025. <\/p>\n

CLICK HERE<\/a> to go online to give your views<\/p>\n

Residents can also find the consultation on the council website at www.midlothian.gov.uk\/LasswadeChildcare<\/a><\/p>\n

The council will hold a public meeting about the proposal on Thursday 16 January 2025 at 6:30pm in Lasswade High School.<\/p>\n

Alternatively, local people can book a 20 minute slot at one of the council\u2019s virtual drop-in sessions. They will run from 2pm to 4pm and 5pm to 7pm on Tuesday 10 December and Thursday 12 December 2024.<\/p>\n

To book a virtual slot email EducationConsultation@midlothian.gov.uk<\/a> Residents can also email EducationConsultation@midlothian.gov.uk<\/a> to ask for a paper copy, which can be posted back to Lasswade High School Childcare Service Consultation, Freepost SCO 622, Midlothian Council, Dalkeith EH22 1DN<\/p>\n

The consultation can also be supplied in braille, large print, audiotape or in your own language although please note the council\u2019s website offers reading, speech and translation support when you use the browse aloud headphones icon at the bottom right-hand side of the pages.<\/p>\n

Anyone who needs any further help should contact EducationConsultation@midlothian.gov.uk<\/a><\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"amzn.to\/3uMBt4X\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":24987,"postDateTime":"2024-11-29 14:35:23"},{"Headline":"Inspirational young people in Midlothian celebrated","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/The-Midlothian-Young-People-Awards-MYPA-2024.jpg","Content":"

\"The-Midlothian-Young-People-Awards-(MYPA)--2024\"<\/p>\n

The winners with Midlothian Provost, Cllr Debbi McCall and Midlothian Young People Awards Lord-Lieutenant, Lt Col Richard Callander. Photograph by Lee Live<\/a><\/p>\n

Written by Midlothian View Reporter, Luke Jackson<\/b><\/p>\n

Amazing young people in Midlothian have been recognised at a special ceremony held at Rosslyn Chapel.<\/p>\n

The Midlothian Young People Awards (MYPA) are open to young people living, working or studying in Midlothian whose contribution to their local community deserves to be acknowledged.<\/p>\n

The award scheme is a collaborative effort supported by the council\u2019s Communities Lifelong Learning and Employability (CLLE) team, Midlothian\u2019s Lord-Lieutenant & his deputes and the Midlothian Youth Platform and other young people.<\/p>\n

Midlothian Council Chief, Executive Grace Vickers, welcomed everyone to the event which was hosted by Group Service Manager Annette Lang supported by S6 St Davids High School pupil, Eustaice Oweh who did a fantastic job as the co-host. Matt Kelly from the council\u2019s Recycling team, who is also a renowned poet, read a poem that he had written specifically for the event.<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"amzn.to\/3XKWH4m\"<\/a>
<\/div>\n

There are five categories of awards: <\/p>\n

The Caring and Volunteering Award <\/strong><\/p>\n

This recognises young people who volunteer in caring activities within Midlothian.<\/p>\n

The Winner in this category was Reuben Ferguson and Runner Up was Chloe Patterson.<\/p>\n

The Sport and Physical Activity Award <\/strong><\/p>\n

This recognises success and outstanding improvement and achievement in a sport for a particular team of individuals or for one individual.<\/p>\n

The Winner was Aimee Aitken and the Runner up was Aimee Falconer<\/p>\n

The Arts and Culture Award <\/strong><\/p>\n

This recognises outstanding achievement in performance, visual arts, music, singing, dance, creative arts and media. <\/p>\n

The Winner was the KP Glee Choir and the Runner Up was Kieran Burnett.<\/p>\n

The Achievement in Learning Award <\/strong><\/p>\n

This recognises young people who demonstrate a commitment in developing skills for work and care about the future of young people in Midlothian.<\/p>\n

The Winner was Jayden Bradley and the Runner Up was Rachel Leitch<\/p>\n

The Local Community Award <\/strong><\/p>\n

This recognises the role young people play in their local community which make a real difference locally, to a village, town or local area.<\/p>\n

The Winner was Jake Mowatt and the Runners Up were brother and sister Blair and Aila Mackenzie.<\/p>\n

The Midlothian Award <\/strong><\/p>\n

This goes to a young person who is chosen from all the nominations and recognises their outstanding contribution to Midlothian as a whole.<\/p>\n

The Winner was Rachel Pettigrew. <\/p>\n

Prizes were presented by Midlothian Provost, Cllr Debbi McCall and Midlothian\u2019s Lord-Lieutenant, Lt Col Richard Callander.<\/p>\n

Each Winner and Runner up received a certificate and a trophy and a charitable donation will also be made on their behalf to a charity of their choice. <\/p>\n

Commenting on the young people\u2019s achievements for the Midlothian Young People Awards Lord-Lieutenant, Lt Col Richard Callander said: <\/p>\n

\u201cAfter receiving a record number of entries for this year\u2019s awards, I am delighted to offer my warmest congratulations to all winners and runners up and thanks to everyone who made a nomination. Once again, these awards have provided an opportunity to highlight some amazing achievements by some of Midlothian\u2019s exceptional young people, who are an inspiration to us all.\u2019<\/p>\n

\u200bMidlothian Provost, Cllr Debbi McCall said:<\/p>\n

“Congratulations to all the winners at the Midlothian Young People Awards 2024. These awards provide a special opportunity to celebrate amazing and determined young people in our community. All the winners should be very proud of their achievements. They are role models and provide inspiration to other young people . A big thank you to everyone who made the effort to make a nomination.\u201d<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"www.midlothianview.com\/support?referral=MidlothianView\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":24982,"postDateTime":"2024-11-29 14:28:27"},{"Headline":"How I will be voting on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Kirsty-McNeill-Midlothian-MP.jpg","Content":"

\"Kirsty-McNeill-Midlothian-MP\"<\/p>\n

This View has been written by Midlothian MP, Kirsty McNeill<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dear Midlothian,<\/p>\n

I am writing to you today about how I will be voting on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. This is what is called a \u2018free\u2019 or conscience vote, meaning individual members of parliament are not subject to any \u2018party line\u2019 on the topic and can vote entirely in line with their own views about what is best for the country.<\/p>\n

Exercising judgement on a moral topic of this magnitude is a responsibility I have taken very seriously. I have gratefully consumed evidence and perspectives from so many organisations and individuals from beyond Midlothian and I would like to put on record my thanks to them all.<\/p>\n

It is, however, to you the people of Midlothian that I am addressing this letter as I want you to understand what considerations have weighed most heavily on me in thinking about this vote. What follows is lengthy. That is because this has been a very finely balanced decision for me and I feel it is important to share with you not only which way I am voting but why.<\/p>\n

I am hugely grateful to those of you who have written to me or attended one of our local community engagement sessions. I appreciate the time you have taken to suggest things I should read, watch or listen to and how thoughtful and thorough so many of you have been in explaining what has brought you to the conclusions you have reached. I feel especially privileged to have heard your stories of loss and I am holding those of you who are grieving particularly close to my heart today. Anyone who has ever lost someone they love knows that you do not \u201cmove on\u201d. I dearly hope, however, that you might \u201cmove forward\u201d and I will be willing you on each step along the hard road to come.<\/p>\n

My rationale for listening so deeply to constituents\u2019 views is not because I wanted to outsource my decision to you. Instead, I have sought to consult and read widely because there are so many competing moral claims and diverging expert views. I have wanted to satisfy myself that I have tested my premises and intuitions thoroughly. There is nobody better to do that with than the people who sent me to parliament.<\/p>\n

I do not expect everyone to agree with either my decision or my reasoning but I do hope, in setting it out, we can understand each other a little more. The ability to disagree well, recognising the humanity of those of different perspectives and the strength and legitimacy of their arguments is, in my view, the single most important skill we must develop in our democracy. That spirit was much in evidence in our discussions in Midlothian. The sensitivity and care with which people have debated some of the most fundamental questions about what it is to be human have been extraordinarily moving and will, I hope, continue to characterise our deliberations in future.<\/p>\n

My vote will be cast\u00a0in favour of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill<\/b>\u00a0at its Second Reading.<\/p>\n

Let me explain why.<\/p>\n

Questions around choice and coercion<\/b><\/p>\n

The most difficult part of this decision has been determining the extent to which choices at the end of life can ever be, or are likely to be, truly free.<\/p>\n

My starting point on this has been that to want the ability to make significant choices about one\u2019s own life is a legitimate desire. It is one that should be facilitated by public policy unless there is a risk of substantial harm to others or good reason to believe that choices are being made under such a degree of pressure that they cannot really be called \u2018free\u2019.<\/p>\n

Many of the people who have told me about their opposition to this bill have given powerful accounts of why they themselves would never choose an assisted death or how they have supported loved ones in their final days who would have never chosen this for themselves.<\/p>\n

These have been very moving discussions about people\u2019s desire to squeeze every last moment out of life, regardless of the suffering they might need to endure. I have been enormously inspired when reflecting on those conversations. They do not, in my view, mean the choice should be denied to\u00a0others<\/i>\u00a0who might place a different premium on their life\u2019s ultimate duration, preferring instead to focus on its remaining quality, or who might have a different view of what is right or moral in their position. That strikes me as a decision every terminally ill\u00a0person should in principle be able to make for themselves, given that it is not a decision about\u00a0whether\u00a0<\/i>to die but instead about\u00a0when and how<\/i>. This is the argument to which I have given most weight.<\/p>\n

The point that has given me pause here is the idea that this choice may not, in reality, be truly free. There are two distinct elements to this argument.<\/p>\n

The first concerns direct coercion, where someone who stands to gain from a loved one\u2019s passing might apply pressure on them to consider assisted dying. The bill specifies a custodial sentence of up to 14 years for anyone who does pressure someone and that is to some extent a reassuring safeguard. But the point I lingered longest over is whether I could be confident that our society is good at\u00a0identifying<\/i>\u00a0coercion in other instances. It is, after all, only since 2015 that \u2018coercive or controlling behaviour\u2019 has been recognised as a specific offence in instances of domestic abuse. This remains a real concern for me but one that I have to weigh against the alternative of maintaining the status quo: currently there are no safeguards at all against coercion in families when terminally ill people end up attempting to take their own life.<\/p>\n

At the moment, over 600 terminally ill people take their own lives each year. In these cases, a criminal investigation after the fact would be needed to establish coercion, but by then it is too late. Under the proposals for assisted dying, three professionals (two doctors and a judge) will be specifically directed to be vigilant against the risk of coercion. Doctors and judges are already routinely required to assess the likelihood or presence of coercion in other instances (including in discussions around ending life-sustaining care in the case of doctors) and they seem to me to be well qualified to take on this new responsibility.\u00a0\u00a0Introducing a system with multiple, clear, and strict legal safeguards, overseen by independent professionals and the courts, in my view does not increase the risk of coercion.<\/p>\n

The second concerns a wider question of whether people will feel pressurised by society at large if assisted dying creates a new climate of opinion that some people are, per the name of one BBC Documentary, \u201cbetter off dead\u201d.<\/p>\n

This argument tends to be about people not wishing to feel like a burden. I take this concern seriously but have decided that it ultimately rests on an elision between\u00a0quality<\/i>\u00a0of life and the\u00a0value<\/i>\u00a0of life. I believe all lives are of infinite value and I believe that is a universal principle held by everyone on all sides of this debate and indeed by those who want this choice to be available to them. We need to be careful, though, not to elide\u00a0quality<\/i>\u00a0of life and the\u00a0value<\/i>\u00a0of life. Every life ends: and when individuals look for help in ending their own, they are making a judgment on the level of suffering they believe that\u00a0they<\/i>\u00a0are able to endure at the end of their life. Seeking this for oneself does not imply anything at all about the value or indeed quality of the lives of others. The people who want this option stress their desire for autonomy as individuals.<\/p>\n

I do accept that it is possible some people will weigh considerations about the impact of their condition on their families and the NHS when deliberating about their final months. We must do everything we can to prevent that from happening but must also acknowledge that this is also the case currently when people make choices about refusing life-sustaining support.<\/p>\n

Questions around vulnerability and values<\/b><\/p>\n

Before going further into how my own values have shaped my thinking I want to be crystal clear about one thing: I feel very privileged to have heard from so many people in Midlothian about how your\u00a0own<\/i>\u00a0values, including those informed by religious faith, have shaped your perspectives.<\/p>\n

Some of you expressed to me an anxiety that your strong views around this bill would be discounted if religiously motivated. They have not been and I welcome ongoing dialogue with faith communities on this question as well as on the causes about which we are all so passionate: fighting poverty, protecting our beautiful planet and supporting those who struggle the most with life\u2019s cruelties and injustices.<\/p>\n

Many opponents of the bill have rightly asked MPs to be particularly attentive to any differential impacts of the bill on people who are vulnerable or marginalised. Just as I believe all lives are of infinite value, all lives are of\u00a0equal<\/i>\u00a0value: indeed that is the very belief that brought me into politics. I have been particularly alive, therefore, to the worry expressed by some disabled people that the discussion around assisted dying could at best be a manifestation of and at worst an entrenchment of ableism.<\/p>\n

It is very clear that the rights of disabled people are routinely violated and I think I understand\u00a0\u2013\u00a0as best as someone without a current disability can\u00a0\u2013\u00a0why some disabled people are so opposed to these proposals. This is one of the reasons I have rejected the language of allowing for \u2018dignity\u2019 in death and instead feel drawn to the idea of choice and autonomy at the end of life. I agree with those advocates who are disturbed by the idea that requiring or receiving personal care means losing dignity. We must guard against any suggestion that personal care compromises dignity when it can be given with a tenderness that, far from compromising, enhances the humanity of those who both offer and receive it.<\/p>\n

I have listened to and reflected on the concern that disabled people could be brought within the scope of assisted dying provisions. I would be resolutely opposed to that and am reassured by the fact that people living with a disability or mental ill health are, under the terms of this bill,\u00a0expressly deemed ineligible<\/i>\u00a0for assisted dying if their only grounds for application would be their disability or mental health condition.<\/p>\n

A number of people who contacted me in support of the bill have drawn my attention to the polling around public attitudes. A question of this complexity is not one that can or should be decided by the numbers of people on one side or the other. I have therefore given weight to polling only in two instances.<\/p>\n

The first is in relation to the views of disabled people. I\u00a0have<\/i>\u00a0dug into the evidence around that and have been reassured that support for assisted dying for the terminally ill is actually higher among disabled people than the wider population.<\/p>\n

The second area where I have found polling illuminating is the much stronger (some eighteen points higher) support for assisted dying among those who have lost a parent in the last five years. I give weight to that because I believe in listening closely to those with lived experience. Many of those who talked to me about the deaths of loved ones talked of their intense distress at being unable to help a dying family member who had asked for \u2018peace\u2019. In contrast, some others described the comfort they had drawn from being present at a chosen end in other countries where assisted dying is legal, where a loved one had been able to say goodbye at a time of their choosing, surrounded by the people and things that had brought them joy and meaning in life.<\/p>\n

The status quo<\/b><\/p>\n

Some of the most persuasive representations I have received have been around the inadequacies of the status quo.<\/p>\n

The most important of these from my point of view is the horrifying rate of suicide among the terminally ill. The Office for National Statistics reports that the suicide rate among those diagnosed with low survival cancers is 2.4 times higher than among others.<\/p>\n

I do not think we can tolerate a situation where people take matters into their own hands in this way. I have been asked to consider the potential trauma that might occur if wider family unsuccessfully oppose a loved one\u2019s application for assistance in dying. I appreciate the risk here. We know for certain, though, that the risk of family trauma exists\u00a0today,\u00a0<\/i>as it does for first responders and others at the scene of these tragedies. I hope one point of agreement among proponents and opponents of this bill alike can be around the urgent need for more support for all families touched by suicides, whatever the surrounding circumstances. They too are in my heart today.<\/p>\n

The second area is that I am deeply uncomfortable that the decisions governing British people accessing assisted dying are made, in practice, by Swiss lawmakers rather than our own. One British person a week dies at an assisted death clinic in Switzerland and this presents a number of challenges. Only those with the financial means can afford the travel and to pay the fees that membership of these organisations requires. Only those with mobility can do so, and some people are travelling to end their lives earlier than they would otherwise like to because they are worried about becoming too unwell to make the journey. And anyone accompanying a dying person to Switzerland risks a police investigation which, while unlikely, compounds the stress and trauma of an already extraordinarily difficult time for families.<\/p>\n

These, of course, are all arguments in favour of\u00a0a<\/i>\u00a0bill, not necessarily in favour of\u00a0this<\/i>\u00a0bill. Plenty of opponents of the bill have rightly said that any vote on legislation, whether at Second Reading or at Third, is a vote on the law as it is proposed and not on an abstract principle. If I felt strongly that\u00a0this bill as drafted<\/i>\u00a0did not have sufficient safeguards, even if persuaded by the \u2018in principle\u2019 case for assisted dying, I would not be voting for it. I am, however, satisfied by the safeguards in\u00a0this<\/i>\u00a0bill and have not heard arguments that I consider on balance persuasive about why I should not be.<\/p>\n

Strong safeguards<\/b><\/p>\n

The bill\u2019s proposer, Kim Leadbeater MP, has said multiple times that she believes this bill to contain the strongest safeguards anywhere in the world. In all of my reading I have not come across an opponent who disagrees. I know there are some opponents who do not believe it is\u00a0possible<\/i>\u00a0to provide sufficient safeguards: that is a legitimate position, but it is not one that I share.<\/p>\n

For an assisted death to occur, two different doctors have to confirm eligibility, which means confirming i) a terminal diagnosis, ii) a six month prognosis for likely death and iii) the capacity to make the decision. Opponents of the bill often cite that medical caution about assisted dying is strongest among those working with the terminally ill. Given that, I don\u2019t think we have reason to believe doctors will be cavalier in making these decisions.<\/p>\n

Another risk bill opponents have identified is that of \u2018doctor shopping\u2019, whereby people would seek the support of another doctor if initially refused. There are a few things that reassure me in this regard. The first is that for this risk to materialise we have to assume widespread malpractice by doctors, with a high number willing to certify eligibility when there in fact is none. The second is that there is no option for \u2018judge shopping\u2019 and the eligibility decision of the two doctors has to be confirmed by a High Court judge. In practice, a person wishing to access assisted dying needs to confirm several times, over several weeks, to several different professionals, that they are clear in their mind about the course they wish to pursue and their eligibility to do so. So many different people would need to collude, over such a sustained period, and avoid detection while they did so, for a person to access assisted dying against their will.<\/p>\n

The final element of this consideration is the one that gave me the most pause. Some opponents of the bill have suggested that while the provision of assisted dying need not diminish the quality of palliative care it could dangerously alter its nature. I am grateful for those who have been involved in delivering hospice or palliative care who raised this with me and outlined their worry that this could fundamentally change the nature of the doctor-patient relationship. The explanatory notes published with the bill make provision for a clearly separate service to deal with assisted dying and this strikes me as a sensible way to allay this concern, ensuring as it would that people providing life-sustaining care and people providing assistance to end life are not one and the same.<\/p>\n

Allied concerns have been expressed about whether the Mental Capacity Act 2005 is the right legislation to use to make capacity assessments in the case of dying, given that it stipulates that capacity should in general be assumed rather than assessed. But this is already the case now when decisions are made about withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.<\/p>\n

Slippery and sticky slopes<\/b><\/p>\n

Many opponents of the bill have looked at the international evidence and drawn the conclusion that passing any form of assisted dying legislation (even on terms that they might themselves support) leads inevitably to a widening of eligibility onto grounds that they would not support. This \u201cslippery slope\u201d argument has two main strands.<\/p>\n

The first is that a general \u201cclimate of opinion\u201d in favour of choice could, once legitimised by parliament, gallop towards undesirable destinations. At our constituency events some people worried that \u201cthere\u2019s nothing to stop another MP trying to widen the eligibility\u201d and I should repeat in this letter what I said in person then. That is entirely correct: nothing in our system precludes future parliamentary or social activism to change the law. And I agree that the laws passed by our national parliament have a powerful normative and societal effect as well as an obvious legal one. I am alive to those concerns although I do not share them. I think it is the nature of our system that social reforms, once enacted, can be taken further\u00a0if parliament chooses<\/i>. But my reading of the international evidence is actually that laws tend not to be radically altered once passed.<\/p>\n

The second concern people have around the slippery slope is that judicial activism might end up with the scope of the law being widened considerably without the consent of parliament. My understanding is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has been pretty clear about this: it considers different laws on assisted dying to be well within the margins of legitimate divergence (the so-called \u201cmargin of appreciation\u201d) among members.<\/p>\n

This means that the ECHR would not intervene to widen those laws.<\/p>\n

In none of the 5 ECHR member states with assisted dying laws has eligibility been widened because of a challenge before the ECHR. In none of the 19 Anglophone countries with a law with a terminal illness eligibility has the court widened it. And in every instance where UK courts have been asked to intervene they have ruled that this is a matter for parliament.<\/p>\n

As many people have brought to my attention, Canada\u2019s laws\u00a0have<\/i>\u00a0been expanded as a result of judicial intervention. That is because Canada has a Supreme Court more analogous to the American model than our own and their original legislation as drafted was deemed incompatible with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. There is no equivalent in this country.<\/p>\n

My own reading of the evidence is that our legal and parliamentary systems mean we are more likely to have \u2018sticky\u2019 rather than \u2018slippery\u2019 slopes in this country. It is currently legal for someone to refuse life-sustaining treatment (like ventilation) or food and water. While it is distressing to think of it in this way, the nature of this decision means we do have to speak plainly: in this country we already allow the terminally ill to starve themselves to death even while in the care of our NHS. In fact, if they wish to die, as matters stand we\u00a0force<\/i>\u00a0the terminally ill to starve themselves to death or to refuse life-sustaining support like ventilation with all the distress that causes both to them and their loved ones. We have been stuck at this position on the slope until now. If we now change the law on assisted dying, we can similarly expect to stick in that new position, rather than that beginning a further slide.<\/p>\n

Palliative care: it\u2019s \u2018and\u2019, not \u2018or\u2019<\/b><\/p>\n

Everyone \u2013 proponents and opponents of this bill alike \u2013 would like to see properly funded, universally accessible palliative care. This is sometimes positioned as in opposition to, or a replacement for, assisted dying. I disagree for a few reasons.<\/p>\n

Firstly, I am convinced that not all suffering can be relieved by even the most effective and skilled palliative care. My sense of the balance of opinion among opponents of the bill is that this is acknowledged but considered an acceptable burden to place on the terminally ill because of the potential harms associated with any change in the law. This seems to depend on a willingness to prioritise one\u2019s own assessment of the potential harms to society over a terminally ill individual\u2019s assessment of what pain they are willing and able to endure.<\/p>\n

One of the ways we know that palliative care does not always relieve people of burdens that\u00a0they themselves<\/i>\u00a0consider intolerable is that 80 percent of those in the Australian state of Victoria who had an assisted death were already receiving palliative care. Research from Marie Curie found that a third of people in England and Wales were \u201cseverely or overwhelmingly affected by pain in their final week of life\u201d. And many people from the UK who travel to Switzerland to access assisted dying have already had experience of British hospice care which\u00a0\u2013\u00a0despite challenges of funding and access (which are real and important)\u00a0\u2013\u00a0is still generally regarded as the best in the world.<\/p>\n

Secondly, I do not have any reason to believe that the provision of assisted dying will see a deterioration in palliative care. In fact, the Health and Social Care Committee found that \u201cIn the evidence we received we did not see any indications of palliative and end-of-life care deteriorating in quality or provision following the introduction of (assisted dying); indeed the introduction of (assisted dying) has been linked with an improvement in palliative care in several jurisdictions\u201d.<\/p>\n

Some thoughts on process<\/b><\/p>\n

Some of the people I most respect have a different view about the process which has led us to today. I have paid particular attention to this argument given the expertise in law and public policy of those making it. Their concerns generally fall into two strands.<\/p>\n

The first is whether there has been enough pre-legislative scrutiny or whether this bill has been \u2018rushed\u2019. My own view is that there is a huge amount of information for MPs to draw upon when voting today.<\/p>\n

Assisted dying has been the subject of prolonged and high-profile public debate and I have been the grateful recipient of a\u00a0huge<\/i>\u00a0volume of constituency and external correspondence on it. There has already been extensive debate in the House of Lords, on a previous Private Members\u2019 Bill in the House of Commons and, here in Scotland, on a bill before the Scottish Parliament, as well as about the international evidence from jurisdictions with some form of assisted dying (covering some 300 million people). There has been a Citizen\u2019s Jury and an inquiry by the Commons\u2019 Health and Social Care Committee lasting 14 months and resulting in a very comprehensive consolidation of the evidence base. While people may legitimately disagree with the vote I am casting at Second Reading I do feel I have had enough input at this stage to cast an\u00a0informed\u00a0<\/i>vote.<\/p>\n

The second concern is whether there is enough provision for scrutiny should this bill pass its Second Reading. Some opponents believe it is wrong for such important legislation to be introduced as a Private Members\u2019 Bill. On this point I am reassured by the precedent of other landmark reforms being introduced in this way and by the confirmation by the former Clerk of the House of Commons, Sir David Natzler KCB, that \u201cPrivate Members Bills\u2019 go through the same legislative scrutiny procedures as Government bills \u2026 And there is as much if not more time for consideration in due course of any amendments from the Lords as for a typical Government bill\u201d. The Bill Committee will look at the bill clause by clause and vote on relevant amendments.<\/p>\n

One particular concern from opponents is that Bill Committees on Private Members\u2019 Bills do not, in general, receive evidence from external witnesses. On this I am reassured on two counts. Firstly, the Standing Orders\u00a0do<\/i>\u00a0allow for the gathering of oral evidence from external witnesses even if it is not the usual practice. There is nothing to stop it in this instance and I would welcome it if the Bill Committee did this. Secondly, I know the diligence with which colleagues have approached our responsibilities at Second Reading. I do not know of a single MP who has been unwilling to consult widely and reflect deeply. This would be magnified many times over for members of the Bill Committee and the external experts and interested parties who have already been in touch to make representations on specific clauses can continue to reflect these concerns in correspondence with members of the Committee.<\/p>\n

It is currently estimated that external parties would have five months between Second and Third readings in which to seek amendments and encourage parliamentarians to vote for or against the bill at Third Reading.<\/p>\n

There is nothing about voting in favour of a bill at Second Reading that compels any MP, including me, to vote in favour at Third Reading. If the bill passes Second Reading today that is the beginning and not the end of more detailed discussions. Please do continue to feed in any evidence or consideration you think I have either missed or unduly discounted. One of my hopes in laying out my thinking in this level of detail is that it will enable exactly that sort of challenge and dialogue.<\/p>\n

Where all this leaves me<\/b><\/p>\n

Being your MP is the privilege of my life and I am aware that my role as a lawmaker gives me an outsized role in this debate. We can all, however, do more to ensure that this is the beginning of a new and better approach to the end of life in our country.<\/p>\n

I have been prompted by my deliberations on this topic to check my details about organ donation are up to date and I will be looking to give blood soon. Please do consider doing likewise. If you\u2019d like to support our nearest hospices you can do so by donating to Marie Curie or St Columba\u2019s. Macmillan also supports end of life care in the wider NHS Lothian region.<\/p>\n

However this vote goes, I hope we can agree that the best response to the enormous ethical questions it raises is to listen to and love one another that bit harder. I have tried to do both in the five months since you entrusted me with representing you. I hope this letter has done some justice to the faith you have placed in me and the enormity of the choice ahead of us all.<\/p>\n

Yours aye,<\/p>\n

Kirsty<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"amzn.to\/3XKWH4m\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":24975,"postDateTime":"2024-11-29 08:37:03"},{"Headline":"Danderhall children turn out to decorate community tree","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Danderhall-xmas-lights.jpg","Content":"

\"Danderhall-xmas-lights\"<\/p>\n

Danderhall community Christmas tree has been decorated by youngsters.<\/p>\n

Written by Local Democracy Reporter, Marie Sharp<\/b><\/p>\n

Hundreds of youngsters helped decorate their village tree as snow fell in a winter wonderland in Danderhall this week.<\/p>\n

The children were invited to bring their own baubles to place on the tree which was unveiled by Danderhall Guerilla Gardeners outside the local primary school.<\/p>\n

Primary Five pupils who work with the local volunteer gardeners led the charge as preparations for the evening were made at the school during the day and more than 200 children took part in decorating it at its official launch on Tuesday.<\/p>\n

The guerilla gardeners, who were established during Covid to take over the care and maintenance of public space from Midlothian Council in a deal which has seen the local authority agree not to spray toxic weedkiller on the ground, oversaw the switching on of the tree lights.<\/p>\n

And they welcomed Santa along to the event with its very own snow machine creating an early festive gift for all those taking part.<\/p>\n

The gardeners thanked Bernard Hunter for donating the tree as well as council landscapers, Shawfair LLP, local councillor Stephen Curran and the school head teacher and staff for making the evening a great success.<\/p>\n

A spokesperson said: \u201cIt was a wonderful evening and so many people were involved in making it a huge success. Our thanks go to everyone who helped.\u201d<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"www.colinbeattiemsp.org\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":24972,"postDateTime":"2024-11-28 19:39:14"},{"Headline":"Council leader \u2018misdirected\u2019 committee, appeal claims","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/elphinstone-plannig.jpg","Content":"

\"elphinstone-plannig\"<\/p>\n

Owners of land on the right say the housing development on the left of road has changed the landscape of their village. Photo courtesy ELC planning portal.<\/p>\n

Written by Local Democracy Reporter, Marie Sharp<\/b><\/p>\n

A council leader has been accused of \u2018misdirecting\u2019 colleagues after a family lost out on their bid to build new homes next to their business by a single vote.<\/p>\n

Carol Auld launched a bid to build three houses on a paddock, next to her work buildings, on the edge of Elphinstone, East Lothian, for her and her daughters to live in and carry on the family business.<\/p>\n

But her application was rejected by East Lothian Council\u2019s planning committee after splitting the vote in half with planning convenor, and council leader, Norman Hampshire holding the casting vote.<\/p>\n

Now an appeal to Scottish Ministers agents for the applicant claim Councillor Hampshire\u2019s position was flawed after he warned approving the application could set a precedent for \u2018every village in East Lothian\u2019 and add that it was his comments which swayed at least one councillor to change their vote, leading to the split.<\/p>\n

Planning officers had recommended the committee refuse permission for the houses saying the paddock was a rural location and new homes would be against their countryside policy.<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"www.midlothianview.com\/support?referral=MidlothianView\"<\/a>
<\/div>\n

However it was argued that since developer Bellway had been given the go ahead to build a large housing estate on the other side of the road from the paddock it was no longer a country location.<\/p>\n

And it was widely acknowledged at the committee meeting that the site was likely to be included in the next Local Development Plan for the area, which sets out future housing land.<\/p>\n

In their appeal statement agents for the applicant say: \u201cIt was unfortunate that the convener of the planning committee (and also leader of the council) misdirected the committee in expressing concern as to the setting of a damaging precedent that would weaken the council\u2019s ability to prevent inappropriate development across the county.<\/p>\n

\u201cHe said that the granting of planning permission would open the door to sites in \u2018every village in East Lothian\u2019 and would fundamentally weaken the council\u2019s position and that they would lose control.<\/p>\n

\u201cOn the back of this direction and highly emotive contribution, Councillor (Shona) Macintosh changed her decision and voted in support of the officer recommendation.<\/p>\n

\u201cHowever it remains our position that Councillor Hampshire misdirected the committee in raising the matter of precedent with such gravity. There is no such thing as precedent, each application should be determined on its own merits, and each application will have a set of unique characteristics
\nthat will avoid clear precedent being set.\u201d<\/p>\n

Councillor Hampshire did not comment on the claims. A council spokesperson said: \u201cReasons for refusal of planning permission were stated at the planning committee meeting on September 3 and it would be inappropriate for us to comment further pending the outcome of this appeal.\u201d<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"www.midlothianview.com\/support?referral=MidlothianView\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":24969,"postDateTime":"2024-11-28 19:36:05"},{"Headline":"Midlothian View is 10 years old today","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Midlothian-View-first-artcile-in-November-2018.jpg","Content":"

\"Midlothian-View-first-article-in-November-2018\"<\/p>\n

Midlothian View's first article in November 2018.<\/p>\n

Written by Midlothian View Editor, Phil Bowen<\/b><\/p>\n

Today it is ten years since the first Midlothian View news article was published. Since then a lot of virtual ink has flowed as we have reported on news and views across Midlothian.<\/p>\n

That first article announced the result of the Midlothian East by-election result when Labour\u2019s Kenny Young was elected to the council. <\/p>\n

Sheriffhall was one of our first major \u2018scoops\u2019 in 2015 when we reported that there were concerns over the delays to the decision to build a flyover. Almost ten years and a whopping 64 Sheriffhall articles later there are still concerns on the delays. <\/p>\n

The council budget continues to be an annual article as whichever incumbent party struggles to match the demands with the available funds.<\/p>\n

Planning and development have always dominated the stories we report on and I suspect they will continue to be as Midlothian continues to be Scotland\u2019s fastest growing county.<\/p>\n

So who is in the Midlothian View team and how did it start? <\/p>\n

Back in 2014 I also started my web and app development business, Pigeon Penguin, with the aim to build websites and apps for local businesses in Midlothian. <\/p>\n

However, before I could get someone to buy a website from me I needed to prove to them that I could build one. Hence, I came up with the idea of building a website to give people a view of what is happening in Midlothian and also a chance to have their view. And so MidlothianView.com was born. <\/p>\n

In those early days I produced about 3 articles a week but slowly interest grew, I joined Twitter and Facebook and interest grew more. Then a good friend suggested I contact our local MSP to see if he would contribute. Not expecting a reply I was shocked to get one an hour later. That was the start of regular monthly columns from politicians of every party.<\/p>\n

It was in those early days that I decided that Midlothian View would be politically neutral and would allow all parties to make their case to readers, and for readers to come to their own conclusions. We still closely guard this principal. Over the years we have been accused of being biased towards every party which I think proves that we are biased towards none and we are achieving our politically neutral principal.<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"www.parliament.scot\/msps\/current-and-previous-msps\/lorna-slater\"<\/a>
<\/div>\n

In 2018 Midlothian View was invited to apply to join the newly created BBC Local Democracy Report Service (LDRS). Not many people know but as part of its charter the BBC must support local journalism and so through the LDRS the BBC fund one reporter in every council area in the UK. We were successful in our application. <\/p>\n

LDR reporters are assigned to a parent news organisation and their role is to report on all council news including meetings. However, the articles they then produce are shared with all local LDR members which includes Midlothian View. <\/p>\n

Slightly typically, Midlothian is considered too small and so we share our LDR reporter, Marie Sharp, with East Lothian. Midlothian View also receives LDR articles for the surrounding councils, East Lothian, West Lothian, Edinburgh and the Scottish Borders. Marie and her LDR colleagues always produce good quality and in-depth articles which Midlothian View readers find very informative. It is always interesting to read the subsequent discussion on Facebook and Twitter about these articles. Without the BBC LDRS then a lot of residents would be none the wiser as to what is happening in Midlothian and surrounding counties.<\/p>\n

Also in 2018 Midlothian View was invited to join the Independent Community News Network (ICNN). This is an organisation run by Cardiff University and setup to support and promote small independent news outlets, such as Midlothian View. Having worked alone for four years it was great to find out that there were over a 100 plus similar Hyperlocals, as we are known, across the UK. <\/p>\n

Hyperlocals account for millions of news page views every day. Collectively we add up to a very significant media output which is similar to the mainstream national media titles. <\/p>\n

The ICNN is doing a great job continuing to fight for the recognition, funding and advertising revenue that hyperlocals deserve. In an age of misinformation on social media, click bait and the demise of the established local news titles then hyperlocals are a beacon of hope for the future of local journalism. Our operating models are much, much leaner and with modern technology we can do so much more to get our news stories reported.<\/p>\n

On the subject of click bait, it was another early decision in 2014 that Midlothian View would present the news in a clear, uncluttered and easy to read form. Unlike other online news websites we do not do click bait, we do not have over 40 adverts in one article but instead we allow the reader to read. <\/p>\n

But we do carry advertising and we do this for two reasons. One we want to support and promote local businesses and two we do need the revenue from advertising to fund what we do. Earning sufficient revenue to keep going is a constant concern for all hyperlocals.<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"www.colinbeattiemsp.org\"<\/a>
<\/div>\n

We used to carry Google AdSense advertising, which is Google\u2019s syndicated advertising network which enables large organisations to advertise on thousands on websites across the world. We got a moderate amount of income from AdSense but I have always been concerned that AdSense promotes multi-nationals rather than local business. Therefore, in the summer of this year we decided to withdraw from the AdSense network and instead concentrate on local advertising. It is a bit of a gamble but I think it is the right one. <\/p>\n

If there are any local businesses reading this then please consider advertising with us and reaching our 35,000+ readers per month. You will not only get great returns from your advertising, you will also be seen as supporting Midlothian View which will be appreciated by our readers.<\/p>\n

Yes that is right, Midlothian View is read by over 35,000 readers per month. Reader numbers have grown year on year and still continue to grow.<\/p>\n

As well as the LDR articles Midlothian View publishes multiple articles a day. The source of these articles varies. A lot come from information provided by local businesses, charities and the council. We of course do our own reporting and in the last two years we have looked to give real world reporting opportunities to student reporters with a tie up with Napier University\u2019s journalism course. These talented journalists have produced some very interesting articles for Midlothian View. This has helped Midlothian View but has also allowed them to build up a good portfolio of articles that they can show future employers.<\/p>\n

So Midlothian View has come a long way in ten years. We are now an established go to source of news for Midlothian and its surrounding counties. I think this was demonstrated in the summer when we were able to organise and sponsor the General Election hustings, which would not have gone ahead without Midlothian View. So we are contributing a lot to the news and views landscape.<\/p>\n

What does the next ten years hold?<\/p>\n

We want to grow, grow and grow. We want to report on the stories that matter. There are a lot of stories that just go unreported as we do not have either the bandwidth or the finance. There are a lot of people and organisations struggling in Midlothian because they do not have the ability to tell their story. There are a lot of decisions made without the people of Midlothian knowing that they are up for discussion. We want to change all of this.<\/p>\n

Midlothian View in the next ten years could grow into something really big and become an even more useful resource for all the people of Midlothian. <\/p>\n

If you would like to help us towards that aim then please do consider supporting us. Just for the price of a cup of coffee every month you will make a difference for us. Please support us by clicking HERE.<\/a> <\/p>\n

I would love to be able to fund a full-time reporter, one of those Napier University journalism students would be ideal for Midlothian View.<\/p>\n

Celebrate with the new MV App.<\/p>\n

To celebrate our tenth anniversary we have launched the Midlothian View app, which has been built by my company Pigeon Penguin. It is hoped that the MV app will build further on our audience and their interaction.<\/p>\n

The MV app will present the news in an easy to use and clear format. It will also help readers and support local businesses by providing an easy to search local business directory, enable businesses to display their latest offers and by partnering with Loyalty Pigeon enable businesses to run a loyalty programme.<\/p>\n

You can download the MV app for free today at either the Apple App Store or the Google Play Store,<\/p>\n

And finally a great big thank you to you our readers. Thank you for reading our articles, providing comments and promoting what we do. Your reaction to the articles we write makes it all worthwhile.<\/p>\n

I really have enjoyed the first ten years with Midlothian View and I am looking forward to the next ten. <\/p>\n

Many thanks<\/p>\n

Phil Bowen
\nEditor, Midlothian View.<\/p>\n

 
\n 
\nTo download the MV app onto your device click the appropriate button below.<\/p>\n

\n\"Download<\/a>\n<\/div>\n
\n\"Download<\/a>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

 
\n <\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"bonnyriggrosepitchfund.co.uk\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":24881,"postDateTime":"2024-11-28 06:00:06"},{"Headline":"Midlothian libraries awarded funding for digital inclusion project","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/digital-inclusion-in-libraries.jpg","Content":"

\"digital-inclusion-in-libraries\"<\/p>\n

Written by Midlothian View Reporter, Luke Jackson<\/b><\/p>\n

Midlothian Libraries have been awarded \u00a315,000 from the national Public Library Improvement Fund (PLIF) for an innovative new project to help local people improve their digital skills.<\/p>\n

Digital Learning Stations will be installed in each library, equipped with tablets, notebooks, or laptops pre-loaded with interactive tutorials and courses on essential digital skills such as basic computer use and internet safety.<\/p>\n

The stations are designed to be user-friendly and accessible to individuals with varying skill levels, making sure customers can learn at their own pace and in their own time.<\/p>\n

Take-home kits will also be available for loan. Each kit will include step-by-step guides, flash drives with resources, and practice worksheets.<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"amzn.to\/3uMBt4X\"<\/a>
<\/div>\n

Midlothian Council\u2019s Cabinet Member with responsibility for libraries, Councillor Ellen Scott said: <\/p>\n

\u201cI think this is a fantastic, inclusive initiative that combines in-library and home-based learning so that people can progress at their own pace.<\/p>\n

\u201cNowadays, there\u2019s an expectation that you should be able to do just about everything online \u2013 from applying for a job to booking an appointment. It\u2019s daunting if you don\u2019t have those skills \u2013 you feel left out and left behind.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis project gives people the confidence and support they need to learn new digital skills that could potentially change their lives by introducing them to new ways to connect with others and access services, helping to tackle digital exclusion in our communities.\u201d<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"bonnyriggrosepitchfund.co.uk\"<\/a>
<\/div>\n

The project is one of 13 across Scotland to be awarded a share of the PLIF. <\/p>\n

The Public Library Improvement Fund (PLIF) is an annual \u00a3450,000 administered by the Scottish Library and Information Council on behalf of the Scottish Government that sees \u00a3200,000 given to support creative, sustainable and innovative public library projects throughout Scotland.<\/p>\n

The PLIF 24\/25 grant, launched in August this year, prioritised applications aimed at strengthening digital inclusion and sustainability efforts, as well as Gaelic and Scots language and new Scots languages initiatives.<\/p>\n

Alison Nolan, Chief Executive of (SLIC), said: \u201cPublic libraries offer truly diverse value to their communities. They provide access to vital services and resources, a wealth of social activities and are hubs for expression and creativity.<\/p>\n

\u201cInvestment is so important for the continued provision of these services, and the Public Library Improvement Fund is one of the ways in which we bolster our public libraries.<\/p>\n

\u201cPeople, place and partnership are the pillars of our strategy for Scotland\u2019s libraries, and this year\u2019s winners captured the spirit of that vision. These thirteen projects expand on the vision of a library as solely a centre of literacy \u2013 they encourage civil engagement, expand people\u2019s skillsets and celebrate the richness of local heritage.\u201d<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"amzn.to\/3uMBt4X\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":24963,"postDateTime":"2024-11-27 17:39:43"},{"Headline":"Jedburgh's banking hub now open","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Jedburgh-Banking-Hub.jpg","Content":"

\"Jedburgh-Banking-Hub\"<\/p>\n

The Banking Hub in Jedburgh.<\/p>\n

Written by Local Democracy Reporter, Paul Kelly<\/b><\/p>\n

Jedburgh residents can cash in from this week with the opening of a new banking hub in the town.<\/p>\n

Cash Access UK, the organisation set up to protect nationwide access to cash, has confirmed today that the new hub is open at 40 High Street, the former Bank of Scotland premises.<\/p>\n

The official opening will take place tomorrow and Charlie Young, president of Jedburgh Callants Club, will be in attendance to cut the ribbon. Everyone is welcome to attend between 11am and noon.<\/p>\n

The hub will offer a counter service operated by the Post Office, where customers of all major banks can carry out regular cash transactions, Monday to Friday, 9am-5pm.<\/p>\n

It also offers a Community Banker service where customers can talk to their own bank about more complicated issues on the day their bank is represented at the hub.<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"bonnyriggrosepitchfund.co.uk\"<\/a>
<\/div>\n

In Jedburgh, the Community Bankers are available on the following days: Monday \u2013 TSB;Tuesday \u2013 Santander; Wednesday \u2013 Bank of Scotland and the RBS on Thursday. No community banker will be available on Friday.<\/p>\n

The hub was initially recommended by LINK, the UK\u2019s cash access and ATM network, following the announcement of the closure of the Bank of Scotland, the town\u2019s last remaining bank branch.<\/p>\n

Jedburgh\u2019s banking hub is the thirteenth to open in Scotland and 11 more are in progress.<\/p>\n

Gareth Oakley, CEO at Cash Access UK, said: \u201cI\u2019m happy to announce the opening of our Jedburgh Hub, ensuring crucial access to cash and face-to-face banking services which are vital to both residents and businesses across the community.<\/p>\n

\u201cCustomers can visit on any day of the week for their everyday banking transactions and if you have a specific or more complex enquiry for your bank, a community banker will be there to help on the day they\u2019re in the hub.\u201d<\/p>\n

If you would like to know more about the Banking Hubs, please contact: cashaccessuk@cicero-group.com.<\/a><\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"www.midlothianview.com\/support?referral=MidlothianView\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":24960,"postDateTime":"2024-11-27 17:35:07"},{"Headline":"Costa coffee cup sticking out of wall of new home","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/costa-cup.jpg","Content":"

\"costa-cup\"<\/p>\n

Costa coffee cup sticks out of hole in wall of new house in Wallyford.<\/p>\n

Written by Local Democracy Reporter, Marie Sharp<\/b><\/p>\n

A dad who discovered a hole on the outside wall of his brand new \u00a3250,000 home had been filled with a Costa coffee cup is calling for an independent regulator to be introduced to hold house builders to account.<\/p>\n

Author Justin Lee Anderson spent three years fighting to have a long list of faults at his five bedroom house in Wallyford, East Lothian, fixed by developers Persimmons.<\/p>\n

He established a local tenants and residents association after discovering his experience was not isolated on the new estate but says he was left frustrated by the housing firm\u2019s lack of response to his problems.<\/p>\n

Now he is calling on the Scottish Government to establish a housing ombudsman to give home owners the right to demand higher standards and ensure developers face consequences when they fail to get it right.<\/p>\n

And he wants local authority planning committees to have the right to reject applications from builders who have failed to produce good quality houses in the past.<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"amzn.to\/3XKWH4m\"<\/a>
<\/div>\n

Justin said: \u201cThere is a presumption of competence given to house builders which is just wrong and allows them to get away with shockingly poor standards without any real consequences.<\/p>\n

\u201cNobody\u2019s properly inspecting the work. Contractors are paid piecework and given too many houses to cover in a day, so they end up leaving rushed, incompetent work to be \u201cpicked up in snagging\u201d. There\u2019s no proper quality control.<\/p>\n

\u201cPlanning committees can\u2019t legally refuse a planning application from a builder as long as that application meets regulations. There is no consideration of the builder\u2019s record of competence. So they can build as many terrible houses as they like and keep getting planning permission for more.<\/p>\n

\u201cOur experience was shocking but not unique as I discovered from talking to neighbours and other people on our estate. It is just not good enough.\u201d<\/p>\n

Justin and his family faced problems from the day they arrived at their new home on the St Clements estate five years ago and discovered the oven and hob in the kitchen had been stolen as the house was not locked before they moved in.<\/p>\n

That was just the first of a string of issues they would discover in the weeks and months ahead including finding a Costa coffee cup had been used instead of a cover for the extractor fan vent at the side of the house.<\/p>\n

They also found issues with the heating which saw the thermostat upstairs controlling the heat downstairs and vice versa, the bath hot water tap producing cold water while the cold tap provided hot water and gaps between the walls and roof and windows allowing cold air into the property.<\/p>\n

The list of snagging did not end there, Justin said: \u201cOur en suite shaver plug only worked when the light was on. Our extractor fan didn\u2019t work at all.<\/p>\n

\u201cElectricians came to fix the plug, so that it worked without the light on. Then the extractor fan was finally replaced and works. Now the shaver plug only works when the extractor fan is on.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe had a similar problem when the shaver plug was finally fitted in our main bathroom. It only worked when the light was on. The electricians had to climb into the attic to sort out that wiring.\u201d<\/p>\n

The family also discovered the pipe from the extractor fan in the bathroom only went as far as the attic and was not attached to any external vent meaning damp air pumped into the loft area.<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"www.midlothianview.com\/advertise\"<\/a>
<\/div>\n

After three years of battling Persimmons and a list of site managers and customer service staff who, Justin said, would regularly leave and be replaced leading to the complaints process starting again, he told the developers he no longer wanted them involved in fixing outstanding problems.<\/p>\n

Justin said: \u201cIt was exhausting and frustrating and I seemed to just get nowhere and I battled for three years. Most home owners would have given up before me and I think developers rely on that.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is absurd that they are making huge profits on houses but get away with botched jobs and using sub standard contractors.\u201d<\/p>\n

Justin took his plight to the Scottish Greens annual conference last month where his call for a housing ombudsman to be appointed to oversee developments and a change of law to allow planners to refuse applications based on a firm\u2019s reputation was adopted by the party as policy.<\/p>\n

Musselburgh councillor Shona McIntosh, Scottish Greens, said it was time for developers to be held to account.<\/p>\n

She said: \u201cIt is like the wild west out there with no regulator overseeing developments or cracking down on shoddy work. This is the biggest investment in peoples\u2019 lives and a major decision for them, yet they are left at the mercy of housebuilders who are not answerable to anyone.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt has to stop.\u201d<\/p>\n

Persimmons said it was \u2018disappointed\u2019 to hear about Justin\u2019s experience with his home, which he moved into in 2019.<\/p>\n

A spokesperson said: \u201cWe are disappointed that Mr Anderson did not receive the level of service we strive to provide and we apologise for the inconvenience he experienced. While we have not been made aware of any issues with the property since 2022, we are committed to addressing any concerns brought to our attention.\u201d<\/p>\n


Midlothian View Advertising<\/a>
\"bonnyriggrosepitchfund.co.uk\"<\/a>
<\/div>","PostId":24957,"postDateTime":"2024-11-27 17:28:12"},{"Headline":"Scams warning as Self Assessment deadline looms","Excerpt":"","FeaturedImage":"https:\/\/www.midlothianview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/HMRC-Midlothian-View-750x500-1.webp","Content":"

\"HMRC-Midlothian-View-750x500\"<\/p>\n

Written by Midlothian View Reporter, Luke Jackson<\/b><\/p>\n

Concerned customers reported nearly 150,000 scam referrals to HMRC in the last year, as Self Assessment filers are warned to be alert to fraudsters.<\/p>\n

With millions of people due to complete their Self Assessment tax return and pay any tax owed by 31 January 2025, fraudsters are targeting people with offers of tax refunds or demanding payment of tax to get hold of personal information and banking details. Around half of all scam reports (71,832) in the last year were fake tax rebate claims.<\/p>\n

There has been a 16.7% increase in all scam referrals to HMRC \u2013 144,298 were received between November 2023 and October 2024, up from 123,596 in the previous 12-month period.<\/p>\n

If someone receives communication claiming to be from HMRC that asks for their personal information or is offering a tax rebate, check the\u00a0advice on GOV.UK\u00a0to help identify if it is scam activity.<\/p>\n

HMRC will never leave voicemails threatening legal action or arrest, or ask for personal or financial information over text message \u2013 only fraudsters and criminals will do that.<\/p>\n

Kelly Paterson, Chief Security Officer at HMRC, said:<\/p>\n

\u201cWith millions of people filing their Self Assessment return before January\u2019s deadline, we\u2019re warning everyone to be wary of emails promising tax refunds.<\/p>\n

\u201cBeing vigilant helps you spot potential scams. And reporting anything suspicious helps us stop criminal activity and to protect you and others who could have received similar bogus communication.<\/p>\n

\u201cOur advice remains unchanged. Don\u2019t rush into anything, take your time and check \u2018HMRC scams advice<\/a>\u2019 on GOV.UK.\u201d<\/p>\n

HMRC will not contact you by email, text, or phone to announce a refund or ask you to request one. Anyone who is due a refund from HMRC can claim it via their online HMRC account or the free and secure\u00a0HMRC app<\/a>.<\/p>\n

HMRC have also given this advice, Protect, Recognise and Report<\/p>\n

Protect<\/strong><\/p>\n